From Alien Abductions Via MKUltra to an Implanted Cyber-Situation

Military abductions (MILAB) for mind control purposes are merely a continuation of the MK-Ultra and similar programs.

by Dr Helmut Lammer

Alien abductions are a very strange and complex phenomenon. For sceptics, most journalists, and the public it is hard to believe that abductions by non human beings have their basis in physical reality. Reports of alien beings entering bedrooms through walls and levitating abductees through closed windows into a waiting UFO are hard for the open-minded researcher to believe, too.

Recently some alien abductees have said that they have been kidnapped by military/intelligence personnel and taken to hospitals and/or military ground/underground research facilities, where they were examined, interrogated and sometimes implanted with tiny devices. Such experiences are called MILABS-covert military abductions of alleged alien abductees. Not many of the popular books on the subject of alien abductions mention these experiences. In fact it seems that well known alien abduction researchers like Budd Hopkins, Prof. David Jacobs and Prof. John Mack ignore such cases, although they know about them.

Especially disconcerting are the facts that abductees recalled seeing military intelligence personnel together with alien beings working side by side in secret military ground or underground research facilities. The presence of human military and/or civilian personnel inhabiting the same physical reality as the alleged alien beings exceeds the mindsets of the sceptics and the open-minded researchers by several orders of magnitude.

In my new book MILABS: Military Mind Control and Alien Abduction, which is co-authored by my wife, we reviewed hypnosis transcripts of MILAB abductees and compare their recovered memories with the experiences of survivors of now known declassified government sponsored mind – or behaviour – control experiments. We found a strong indication that covert ‘human’ military personnel are indeed involved in the alien abduction phenomena. In coming to such a conclusion we researched in our book the following points.

  • Documented history of secret mind – and behaviour – control experiments.

  • A possible purpose of MILABS.

  • Activity of dark unmarked helicopters in connection with alien abductions.

  • Alleged kidnappings of alien abductees by covert military/intelligence

  • Genetic aspect of MILABS.

  • Otherworldly journeys and military underground facilities.

  • Creating an imaginary alien abductee.

  • Toward a controlled society: terrestrial implants and their application to MILABS and future warfare.

  • Military interrogation sessions with alleged alien abductees.

In this article I will address the implant situation, since it is important to offer an overview of terrestrial implant research, technology and its applications for covert operations like MILABS. Implanted electrodes were being used on unwitting persons as early as fifty years ago.

Implant technology was developed after World War II. Both superpowers, the U.S. and the Soviet Union researched intra-cerebral mind-control, electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB), biological radio communication technology called telemetry. An electromagnetic wave can broadcast to a receiver/transmitter located under the skull or in the brain. This signal then records the brain activity and relays it to a computer for analysis, by which all aspects of the subjects life can be monitored. Mrs. Janine Jones from New Zealand is a very early implanted mind control victim. Mrs Jones parents were Norma and Reginald Paul Philips, the latter a prominent politician and Chief Justice of Western Samoa. She was adopted after an implant surgery in 1949. Her natural and adopted parents had backgrounds in the military. Upon her birth at LoverHutt Hospital, she was taken straight into an operating room where she was put on a life-support system, and illegal psychosurgery was performed via stereotaxic methods of drilling into her skull. The incisions left scars that remain to date.

Mrs. Jones is in the possession of x-rays which show implants in the cavities near the cochlea’s of both ears and one in the brain above the nose. Mrs. Jones has very good evidence to back her case, since Dr. Richard Thompson from England has analysed her x-rays and given a statement as follows:
‘Lateral projection shows a foreign object implanted in the frontal lobe directly adjacent to the nasal passages. This object is most probably a radio transmitter... interference in blood circulation is spreading over large areas of the brain. Concentrated in the frontal lobes and in particular around the foreign object. It is highly likely that this blood-flow impairment is the result of the radio-frequency emanating from the transmitter. This, in turn, causes a depletion in oxygen levels and reduced nutrient supply to these areas of the brain, where changes in neurological activity are inevitable.’

Mrs. Jones wrote to me recently:
‘Currently it is fair to assume that the two sets of electrodes inserted into my skull are firmly enmeshed with bone, muscle, nerves, blood and chemicals inside my brain. I am, in effect, a live radio circuit. The surface around my ears to the base of my skull emits gas which discharges in audible ‘plops’ onto nearby objects like wood, plastic, metal and worst of all my bedtime pillow at night. When I am directly in the path of oncoming microwaves, my head discharges like a volley, pouring into the surrounding environment.’

Swedish researchers also have evidence in x-rays of operations that took place at Karolinska Hospital in 1946 and Sachska Children Hospital in 1948, both facilities located in Stockholm. The mother of one such victim claimed that she heard her son Bengt’s screams from the lab-room during an unscheduled visit. As she rushed in she saw a surgical team and nurses, who ushered her out, although she witnessed how they were driving a large amount of electrodes through the base of her son’s still soft skull. Bengt has suffered for over 48 years from these medical experiments, he has also spent several years of his life in a psychiatric unit.

During the late 1950s and early 1960s neuro-scientist Dr. Jose Delgado invented the stimoceiver, an electrode capable of receiving and transmitting electronic signals via FM radio waves. Such a device, implanted in the brain via the sinus cavities, will act as a powerful stimulant when activated by FM radio wave. One can speculate that the stimoceiver has since been modified to receive stimulation from microwave pulses and is capable of wielding a great degree of control over the implanted victim’s response mechanisms.

One of the best documented cases of implantation of unknown electronic devices is the case of Robert Naeslund. The first doctor to support his struggle to show what he has been used for, Prof. Peter Lindstrom at University of California wrote in a letter to him:
‘In response to your most recent letter regarding the roentgen films I can only confirm that some foreign objects, most likely brain transmitters have been implanted at the base of your frontal brain and in the skull... I fully agree with Lincoln Lawrence who in his book “Were We Controlled?” on page 27 wrote: “There are two particularly dreadful procedures which have been developed . Those working and playing with them secretly call them ‘R.H.I.C. and E.D.O.M.' – Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control and Dissolution of Memory.’’

Robert Naeslund describes in a report which is available from Gruppen, a Swedish organisation opposing mind control experiments:
‘It was on my first occasion with the police, the 10 March 1972, that I was put to sleep without my consent and when I awoke a few hours later is was to a whole new circumstances. The first thing I was aware of was a deeply disturbing radio signal in my head. As one can see from x-ray pictures, this transmitter had been inserted through my left nostril. Dr. Lindstrom’s reference in his second letter to the process as ‘electronic dissolution of the memory’ is a fitting description of what was an obvious changement of my memory functions because of the intensive radiation.’

What is clear is that the exploitation of human beings in secret experiments by mind-control had given rise to a new mentality amongst these involved. British implant victim N’Tumba described similar effects:
‘… Concerning the brain implant in my head, it has been performing without my knowledge or consent...What’s very outrageous is that I am sharing all my vision, thought images, hearing...etc. with people around me as the security services are engaging in a large scale propaganda drive to smear my character, background, behavior, emotions and motives...I have no privacy at all...I am not a spy, I am not a criminal, I am not a terrorist. Being an innocent victim of MI5...My persecution started in June 1988…’

Mr. N’Tumba has x-rays in his possession that were reviewed by medical experts in Stockholm, Sweden. The doctors confirmed that a tiny transmitter has been implanted in his left nostril. Furthermore, one can see that electrodes placed in the occipital lobe are blocking the blood flow causing oxygen depletion. This is seen as well in his frontal brain just above the implanted transmitter. Moreover, Mr. N’Tumba has obviously been anaesthetised without his knowledge, or this implantation could not have been performed.

There are CIA documents which were released via the Freedom of Information Act in the USA, which document that the American spy agency researched implants during its MKULTRA mind control projects 40 years ago.

A declassified CIA MKULTRA Subproject No. 94 document, dated November 22, 1961 , shows that this subproject dealt with miniaturised stimulating electrode brain implants. After having succeeded in remote conditioning and animal control, there was interest in expanding this area of research to human subjects,

Interestingly there exists a research proposal for the same subproject where the CIA proposed secret field studies on humans in the 1960’s! This is the time where the first alien abduction cases like Betty and Barney Hill came into the implant/mind-control field studies.

We show in our MILABS book that it is easy to create alien abduction scenarios with the help of hallucinogenic drugs and hypnosis as a cover for hiding secret mind control experiments. We present a declassified CIA MKULTRA document which shows the use of psychochemicals to control or discredit an individual. Interestingly, they discuss studies that are based on a strictly ‘need to know’ basis in the field.

Alleged alien abductees have been reported since the 1960s. How strange that non-human beings implanted them by placing small objects up their nose through the nasal passage and sinus cavity. An important fact is that transnasal implantation is in common use in neurosurgery! One can therefore speculate if the alleged alien beings doing such implant procedures in reality are agents from black ops units?

A secret agency, interested in tracking and monitoring physiologic information about a person who is unwittingly used for covert tests or experiments with directed energy weapons could also use Bio-medical telemetry. This is defined as a special area of biomedical instrumentation that permits transmission of physiologic informationfrom an often inaccessible location to a remote monitoring site. The transmitting unit can be implanted within the subject’s body. Animals have been monitored with bio-telemetry for about thirty years. By using telemetric systems as a method of monitoring alien abductees, the military could obtain data, such as information on respiration, muscular tension and the presence of adrenaline in the bloodstream.

Recently, the Austrian TV program ORF2 reported in the scientific magazine Modern Times that medical researchers sponsored by the German government developed a brain-implant for monitoring people for heart attack prevention or other medical purposes. The bio-telemetric brain implant has the size of a rice grain (0.8x2mm). It was reported that this 21 million dollar ‘civilian’ research project was given a top priority by the German science ministry. The whole report was propaganda for the ‘medical’ use of brain-implants.

Medical doctors were quoted who had envisioned that in the near future ‘everybody’ would be implanted with such a device. They claimed that three hundred thousand people per year suffering from heart attacks in Germany alone could be protected with this biotelemetic monitoring technique. Sadly, nobody reported the negative aspects of this technology. If the visions of some doctors and governments come true, that everybody will be implanted and monitored with such devices, then George Orwell’s 1984 would look old fashioned.

Cognitive manifestations and activity such as thoughts and visual impressions or emotions, and behaviour and psychological reactions could continually be registered, making it possible for secret military/intelligence agencies, medical scientists and the government to observe an implanted individual in a deeper and more comprehensive way than the person himself could.

Through analysis and manipulation by computer, it is even possible for changes in an individual’s physical and mental status to be effected. The potential of intracerebral remote control is limited only by the imagination of the researcher.

We show in our book MILABS that there is also a great military interest in implants today. A recent paper published for the Air Force, looking ahead to technological needs in the year 2025, has the title ‘Information Operations: A New War-Fighting Capability’. In this paper, the authors also write about a brain-implanted cyber situation. They propose implanted microscopic brain chips to perform two functions. First, the bio-chip connects the implanted individual to a constellation of integrated or smart satellites (IIC) in low earth orbit, creating an interface between the implanted person and the information resources. The implant relays the processed information from the IIC to the user. Second, the biochip creates a computer-generated mental visualisation based upon the user’s request. The visualisation encompasses the individual and allows the user to place himself into a selected ‘battlespace’. In addition, a wide range of lethal or nonlethal weapons would be linked to the IIC, allowing special authorised implanted users (super-cyber-soldiers) to directly employ these weapons.

This means that a soldier would be capable of viewing the normal world plus an overlay of information identifying and describing specific objects in his field of view. He would now be able to evaluate the threat those targets represented and order a variety of weapons systems to engage and destroy the targets from a distance.

The military study concludes, that cyber-soldiers should converse with computers. It is also interesting that the brain implants, used for the proposed cyber-situation should disintegrate if the implanted soldier is captured or killed by the enemy, the chip disintegrates and cannot be extracted by the enemy for reverse engineering.

Further, when faced with events of espionage and defections of friendly users to the enemy side, the IIC satellites would have the capability to deactivate and disintegrate the offender’s implanted chips. Interestingly, disintegrated implants were sometimes reported after their removal by persons who claimed that they were abducted by aliens.

One can see from such military studies that secret research in human-brain-machine and virtual-reality implant research is already well underway. Some of the references in this paper refer to military research institutes and are classified for the public. Since the authors write that implanting devices in human beings raises ethical and public relation issues today, everybody who is in the possession of the IIC/brain implant technology would be a ‘Big Brother’ who could watch over the whole globe. We should ask who the guinea pigs are in these futuristic research projects?

Interestingly, they suggest that concerns about implanting things in the human organism may be founded on today’s thinking; in 2025 the notion may not be as alarming. It seems that we are moving to a ‘monitored’ and ‘implanted’ society!


Lindquist, Lennart, Taylor, Evamarie, Naeslund Robert. ‘Cybergod.’ Gruppen, Stockholm, Sweden, 1996.
Delgado, Jose, M.R. Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society, Harper and Row, New York, Evaston and London, 1969.
Private communications with various mind-control victims and research organizations like Ed Light’s Mind-Control Forum, http://.mk.netlmcf,19961998.
Private communications with Robert Naeslund, 19961998 Lammer, Helmut, and Lammer, Marion. Verdeckte Operationen: Militaerische Verwicklungen in UFO-Entfuehrungen (Covert Operations: Military Involvement in UFO Abductions/mind-control/Bio chips/underground Bases/Exotic Weapons). Herbig (Thomas Wimmer Ring 11, D-80539 Munich), Munich, 1997.
Private communication with Robert Naeslund and: Naeslund, Robert. Letter to Prime Minister Carl Bildt, Stockholm, November 19, 1992.
International Network Against Mind-Control, Box 136, 11479 Stockholm, Sweden, 1992
Hardy, J. ‘Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy’, Neurosurgery., Vol. 34, page 582-594, 1971.
Griffith, H.B., et al. ‘A Direct Transnasal Approach to the Penoid Sinus.’ Technical Note, J. Neurosurgery, Vol. 66, page 920-924, 1987.
Rosenfeld, J.V. ‘Transnasal Stereotactic Biopsy of a Civus Tumor.’ J. Neurosurgery, Vol. 76(5), page 878-879, 1992.
Jutter, C., dean, Wen, H. Ko., Spear, M., Thomas, Mackay, Stuart. ‘Bio-medical Telemetry.’ Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, March, 1993. Bochdansky, Alexander. ‘Ein Chips im Kopf schlaegt Alarm’, Modern times, ORF2, January 9, 1998.
‘Air Force 2025: 2025 support officer Air University, Air Education and Training Command.’ Developed by the Air Force Base, Alabama, August, 1996.
Osborne, William, B. (LTC), Bethel, Scott, A. (Maj), Chew, Nolen, R. (Maj), Norstrand, Philip, (Maj), Whitehead, Yulin, G. (Maj). ‘ Informations Operations: A New War Fighting Capability.’ A Research Paper presented to Air Force 2025, August 1996.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and for the general purpose of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, research and / or educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use this material for purposes other than provided by law. You must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

Copyright © 2022   All Rights Reserved.